Relative Returns: Dotcom Fever Heats Up Growth Stocks

Starting in the mid-’90s, as capital poured into tech startups, and terms like “web browsing” and “e-commerce” entered our vocabulary, the U.S. economy boomed and investors counted on continued expansion.  

How did markets behave during this period? Which stocks overperformed? 

After the Federal Reserve, under Chairman Greenspan, assured it would continue to support the expansion fueled by venture capital and the tech frenzy, the difference in total return between growth and value stocks  was 73.21% (12/30/96 -12/31/99).   


Source: Bloomberg. Date Range: 12/31/93 – 12/29/00. The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. One cannot invest directly in an index.

Stocks offer great potential for growth over time. But different categories of stocks move in cycles, each reacting to different economic environments in different ways. What if you could take full advantage of cyclicality in the markets? Click here for to find out how.

 

 

Direxion Relative Weight ETFs Risks – Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. The ETFs’ investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in or shorting securities or other investments. There is no guarantee that the returns on an ETF’s long or short positions will produce high, or even positive returns and the ETF could lose money if either or both of the ETF’s long and short positions produce negative returns.  Please see the summary and full prospectuses for a more complete description of these and other risks of the ETFs.